Trump pushed CIA to find, kill Osama bin Laden’s son over higher priority targets

When the CIA gave Trump a list of major terrorist leaders to kill, he said he’d never heard of them. Instead he focused on a target with a famous name.

Image: President Donald Trump speaks at a White House summit on Dec. 12, 2019.

WASHINGTON — When intelligence officials briefed President Donald Trump on the most worrisome terrorist threats during the first two years of his tenure, they regularly mentioned the names of the senior terrorist figures the CIA was working hardest to find and kill, including the leader of al Qaeda, Ayman al-Zawahri.

Trump would ultimately greenlight successful strikes on ISIS leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi and Yemeni al Qaeda chief Qasim al-Rimi — perhaps the most significant names on the CIA list of potential U.S. targets.

But he was more interested in a young and less influential figure much farther down the list, according to two people familiar with the briefings, because he recognized the name.

“He would say, ‘I’ve never heard of any of these people. What about Hamza bin Laden?'” one former official said.

“That was the only name he knew,” a Pentagon official added.

Although Osama bin Laden’s youngest son was not believed to be planning attacks, the U.S. ultimately carried out an airstrike that killed him in 2018, according to current and former officials familiar with the matter. At first, officials weren’t sure of his fate, but in July, NBC News was the first to report that U.S. officials believed he was dead.

An examination of the process that led to the strike against Hamza bin Laden puts a spotlight on how Trump has approached what is among the most weighty responsibilities of the U.S. president in the post-9/11 era: deciding which of America’s enemies should be marked for death.

Trump’s recent decision to target Iranian Maj. Gen. Qassem Soleimani — in the face of intelligence suggesting that Iran would seek to retaliate for the Quds Force commander’s death by killing Americans — illustrates the high-stakes nature of such decisions. Improvements in weaponry and in the technology for finding targets have given this president lethal options his predecessors never had, but the greater freedom of action can make the decisions tougher.

Yet Trump — who doesn’t read or digest detailed intelligence assessments, according to current and former officials — says he operates on instinct. “I have a gut, and my gut tells me more sometimes than anybody else’s brain can ever tell me,” he said in answer to a question about the economy during an interview in November 2018.

“The president’s highest priority is keeping Americans safe,” said a senior administration official, who spoke on condition of anonymity. “He and his administration have successfully targeted the most dangerous and deadly terrorists in the world in order to protect the American people, including Hamza bin Laden, al-Baghdadi, Qassem Soleimani, and Qasim al-Rimi. These and countless other measures that have removed dozens of high value targets exemplify this administration’s resolve to defeat terrorism.”

The White House announced the successful strike on al-Rimi, the leader of al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula, on Feb. 7. He and Baghdadi, the ISIS leader killed in a U.S. commando raid that Trump authorized in October, were at or near the top of every intelligence priority list, officials say.

But former CIA official Douglas London, who led an agency unit targeting senior terrorists in 2018, said what he called Trump’s “obsession” with bin Laden’s son “is one example of the president’s preference for a ‘celebrity’ targeted killing versus prioritizing options that could prove better for U.S. security.”

In a piece for the website JustSecurity.com, which London says was reviewed and deemed unclassified by the CIA, he wrote, “CIA had not overlooked the value in Hamza’s name recognition, nor his musings posted by al Qaeda’s media cell, but he was young, lacked battlefield experience, and had yet to develop a serious following.”

Few if any counterterrorism experts argue that Hamza bin Laden was not a lawful target. He was urging attacks on Americans on behalf of a terrorist group with which the U.S. is at war, and he was seen by experts as a possible future al Qaeda leader.

But the CIA assessment at the time was that he was not next in the line of succession and was not a top threat, according to London and other U.S. intelligence officials who spoke on condition of anonymity.

“Despite intelligence assessments showing the greater dangers posed by Zawahri … and the unlikelihood Hamza was in the immediate line of succession, the president thought differently,” London wrote. “He regularly demanded updates on Hamza and insisted we accelerate our efforts to go after him.”

Trump’s wishes “necessarily influenced the alignment of the Intelligence Community’s focus and resources,” London wrote in an unusual peek behind the scenes into the secret process of targeting terrorists.

London suggested that politics may have been a factor in Trump’s decision-making.

“It was not lost on us working the issue that the president pressed hardest for results in the run-up to the 2018 midterm elections,” he wrote.

The Pentagon, the State Department and various intelligence agencies had input into the process of nominating Hamza bin Laden for lethal action, according to a former senior U.S. official directly familiar with the matter.

But Hamza bin Laden was not a top priority until Trump’s exhortations influenced the extent to which the CIA devoted scarce manhunting resources to tracking him, according to London’s account.

For a long time, Hamza bin Laden was an afterthought.

In the wake of the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, when the U.S. invaded Afghanistan, he was among bin Laden’s family members who made their way to Iran, where he lived for a number of years, some of them in detention, intelligence officials say.

But in August 2015, al-Zawahri appeared in a video and introduced the younger bin Laden, calling him “a lion from the den of al Qaeda.”

Bin Laden didn’t appear in the video, but he said in an audio-only part, “What America and its allies fear the most is that we take the battlefield from Kabul, Baghdad and Gaza to Washington, London, Paris and Tel Aviv, and to take it to all the American, Jewish and Western interests in the world.”

He quickly became a fixture in al Qaeda messages, and counterterrorism officials took notice. The news media began reporting on the possibility that he was being groomed as a future terrorist leader. After the death of the senior bin Laden at the hands of Navy SEALs in Pakistan in 2011, and amid the rise of the Islamic State militant group, or ISIS, al Qaeda was struggling for relevance.

By the time of his father’s death, officials believed Hamza bin Laden had relocated to the Afghanistan-Pakistan region.

Still, during the Obama administration, there was little focus on Hamza bin Laden, three former senior officials said. He did not figure in intelligence assessments about the terrorist threat.

“I don’t remember a single meeting at which we focused on Hamza bin Laden,” said Joshua Geltzer, who was the top counterterrorism official on the National Security Council until early in the Trump administration.

A former senior counterterrorism official added: “He had the name, but he didn’t have a lot of working relationships with people, and he didn’t have battlefield experience.”

In November 2017, the CIA released documents seized in the bin Laden operation, including a video of Hamza bin Laden’s wedding to the daughter of 9/11 hijacker Mohamed Atta.

Trump was president by then, and the video prompted a spate of television coverage. Fox News, a favored source of information for the president, devoted significant airtime to the release of the CIA documents and the video of the younger bin Laden.

Inside the U.S. government — and among U.S. allies, according to a senior Western intelligence official — there was heightened concern that Hamza bin Laden could refresh al Qaeda’s ailing brand.

But there was no evidence that he was involved in attacks or even inspiring them, experts say.

“It is not clear at all that Hamza presented an actual serious threat of inspiring attacks,” said Seth Jones, a counterterrorism expert at the Center for Strategic and International Studies who advises the U.S. government.

But Jones said he believes Hamza bin Laden was a justifiable target.

Nonetheless, he said, “I can’t remember a case where I’ve seen an interrogation of a terrorist who said he was inspired by Hamza bin Laden.”

Download the NBC News app for breaking news and politics

Last March, the U.S. government announced a $1 million reward for information helping to locate Hamza bin Laden. There was a consensus that such a step was warranted, officials said.

Still, the size of the reward was telling. It paled in comparison to the $10 million offered for senior al Qaeda operative Saif al-Adel or the $25 million the U.S. had once offered for the senior bin Laden.

“Hamza bin Laden is wanted for questioning in connection with his membership in the al Qaeda organization and his public declarations threatening the security of the United States,” the wanted poster said.

But by then, officials now believe, Hamza bin Laden was already dead.

Al Qaeda leader al-Zawahri and his top lieutenants are believed to be very much alive.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

RSS
Follow by Email
Copyright 2020 KGC News | All Rights Reserved | Privacy Policy | Terms and Conditions